29 August 2005

Monitor your Teen Drivers Part II

Driving with male teens is risky!
Washington August 29, 2005 10:17:21 AM IST
Here's a great article that seems to confirm some of the empirical 'knowledge' many of us carry around. Male teens are high-risk drivers, and male teens with other male teens in the car are significantly more risky. My daddy had an old saying which has often proved true ... one boy is half a man, two boys a quarter man and three boys is no man at all.
What's a parent to do? One place where technology can help make things better for today's parents than they were for my parents is to give serious thought to requiring your teen driver to be tracked full time by a GPS device.
The issues of privacy, trusts and caring always surface, but the fact is, a parent has the duty and the responsibility to do what they must to bring a child trough to adulthood. Start working with your children at the earliest possible age to teach them about road responsibility. Make sure _you_ always drive as you want your children to drive. And broach the idea early that the privilege of driving will be conditioned upon monitoring.
The most trusted drivers in the country ... long haul truckers who go out on the road for days or weeks at a time, carrying precious or dangerous cargo are almost always under constant monitoring. Trust but verify.
There are many devices and systems you could use, but whatever your decision, use one. There is no greater responsibility, nothing about your job, your children's friends opinions, your feelings about privacy, etc. that is _anywhere_ near as important as your primary parental responsibility.
No one can guarantee that monitoring your child will someday result in them thanking you for caring, but one thing for sure, if they don't live to adulthood, you won't be getting any thanks at all.

26 August 2005

Businesses are waking up?

Businesses get frugal with fuel
09:32 AM CDT on Friday, August 26, 2005
By ANGELA SHAH and BRENDAN M. CASE / The Dallas Morning News
Interesting article today that covers a lot of ground vis-a-vis constantly rising fuel costs and the toll on businesses everywhere.
An interesting fact that didn't make the article was that the fuel savings vehicle auxiliary power unit from Energy and Engine Technology Corp is not at all unique so far as the power saving technology. There's plethora of on-board APUs out there that claim to, and certainly will save fuel. What's unique about the featured solution however, is that it is being marketed as GPS capable, so that 'savers' can track not only how much they saved, but where they saved it.
It's perhaps an unfortunate quirk in the EPA's Clean Air regulations, but a viable quirk none the less that pollutants spewed out the stack in one area are of much more concern than the same amount of pollutants spewed somewhere else. Companies in special compliance zones who are allowed to emit 'X' amount of pollution, but who can prove they emitted less are allowed to sell, trade or barter the difference.
My little company has been trying to pitch this idea for several years now, with limited success. Municipalities and business know that the 'where' of pollution, fuel wastage, dangerous driving, etc. can be determined, but they just haven't correlated it with the fact that location can be very easily and cheaply determined in today's GPS world. A failure of education on my part I guess.
several people in the scientific GPS world have used the phrase, 'The Power of Place'. Perhaps one outcome of this latest fuel debacle will be that this power can migrated into the non-GPS geek world.